Is Pop Art Celebration Or Critique Film Studies Essay

Is stamp out Art Celebration Or Critique Film Studies Essay crop up- contrivance was an fraud front man that emerged in the States and Britain in the mid 50s and culminated between 1960 and 1965. Pop dodge was a egress of a post war era and a sudden inflow of mass production and universal conclusion. Pop contrivance included images from step to the foreular gardening such as consumer goods, magazines and advertisements as opposed to to a greater extent effective elitist culture wile like abstract expressionism. It was utilize as a bridge between contemporary life and contrivance, often using steel images/objects and a endeavor toward using mechanical rendering/production techniques.In Britain- unconditional chemical groupIn 1952, a collection of artists in capital of the United Kingdom by the name of the Independent host began to meet regularly to dispute topics such as the found object, science and technology and mass cultures stray in fine art. Members in the group were,Eduardo Paolozzi,Richard Hamilton, architectsAlisonandPeter Smithson, and critics Lawrence Allo manner and Reyner Banham. In the archaean 1950s Britain was still escaping the austerity of the post-war years, and the British citizens were dubious about Ameri arouse popular culture. Although the group was suspicious of the American commercial character, they were still longing and excited about the fruitful world popular culture seemed to previse for the future. The material, mainly in images they discussed at length were of that found in western sandwich movies, comic books, science fiction, automobile design, billboards, and contention and roll music.Richard HamiltonRichard Hamilton was a vauntingly name in pop art in Britain, with his famous montage just what is it that makes todays homes so contrary, so appealing which was produced for ThisIsTomorrows catalogue. Richard was part of the Independent Group that had sensed post war culture would be democratic in ea ch(prenominal)y comprehensive and accessible and argued that art should follow suit. The independent group besides aimed toward removing the academia slowly modern art such as high art like Rothkos light crimson over black and toward a more(prenominal) than than figurative, unambiguous run-in of art depicted in the transparent language of advertising and iconography. This new art didnt need particularly skilled or difficult process to be produced and tried to link the realms of art and free-and-easy life.The interchange-ability between advertising and art allowed Richard to show viewers that modern art repeatedly celebrated physical pleasure and inspiration was often poised from previous efforts. Hamilton stated that this New art, should be Popular, transient, expendable, low cost, mass produced, young, witty, sexy, gimmicky, glamourous and big business this subsequently laid down the path for the social movementJust What is it That Makes Todays Homes so Different, So Appealing?In this piece Richard Hamilton used popular images and symbols as a gateway or library to look the interior of a house of that time and to comment on the spry and measurable change in the way of everyday life.Just what is it that makes todays homes so incompatible, so appealing?Is so iconic because it was created during an era in which all population globally and worldwide became leisure lead astraypers, watchers of television, drivers of cars, and disposable buyers. At the selfsame(prenominal) time, the boundaries between old world civilizations and of international politics were disintegrated by capitalist economy a few countries made the choice to adopt the trimmings of that stinting system without inviting its basic taxs of competition, efficiency, legitimacy of profit, which all ultimately make the consumerist structure cipher and mature properly.The travesty of Westernized ideas of an effective business pass on is interpreted in this collage by the excess of items obtained with clamorous consumption. They are shown as symbols of leisure. And the observer is reminded of how quickly that great deal forget about the consequences of irresponsible spending, since the buy, buy, buy lifestyle continues at a continuingly faster rate, regular(a) after the nations of the world were warped as a result of the scotch disasters in 1929. This is evident in the technological advancements that befuddle permeated into this skewed interior, with a television playing an advertisement of a lady talking on the telephone, the vague cube-like recording device on the floor, the fanciness and glamour related to the arena past the lounges window, and the ornament of a Ford hood bejewelled on the lampshade. unconnected from the subject matter related to financial history, Hamilton besides recognises the presence of fabianism portrayed as a crescent of a planet which also acts as the houses ceiling. This segment of the globe is inconspicuously there, l ooming over and haunting the American homeowners with the vague signifier of all that was unfamiliar during the 1950s communism. The reference to planets and dummy begins to attract attention to the informal Space Race between Russia and America, an most-valuable rivalry that would supposedly declare the more proficient country to be the symbolical leader of the world.Modernity, material comfort, and desirability portray in Hamiltons crusade were icons that undoubtedly have broadened the potential of Pop Art by vivid an ideal kingdom of the imminent buyers paradise, while conveying a probationary and ironic tone articulating the mode of sheer parody. This piece is then non only a creative playing field aesthetically, exclusively also a milestone in the history of the art world and in the context of social critique.Eduardo Paolozzi Dr. PepperEduardo Paolozzi was like Richard Hamilton a member of the Independent Group, who brought a lart Brut perspective to things, which means he brought an outsiders perspective, supposedly because of his connections to daddy and surrealism.This piece is made up of images from American magazines that he had obtained from American people in Paris. It is hard to understand why Paolozzi mustve been sucked into the exotic society portrayed in American magazines having been in poverty himself due to the Second military personnel War. In dr pepper there are happy and healthy people surrounded by an abundance of food and automobiles, this all portraying a Wealthy life, with happiness being the key here.Paolozzi wasnt just attracted to the material nourish or message of consumerism or happiness. Paolozzi genuinely believed these images from advertisements to be artistically wealthy and an icon of the modern world. Paolozzi had once said in his opinion of American Popular images where the event of selling tinned pears was transformed into multi-coloured dreams, where sensuality and manfulness combined to form, in our vi ew, an art form more subtle and fulfilling than the Jewish-Orthodox choice of either the Tate Gallery or the Royal Academy (Eduardo Paolozzi, backward affirmations in Robbins, p.192).This new outlook was soon to be embraced on an international scale as this work is actually a predecessor to Pop Art and wasnt actually part of the movement. Paolozzi was trying to respond to dada-ism and surrealism although his work is about ingenious in seeing the future of art.In America-It seemed that the American dream was no longer defined by political freedom, but instead was measured by the number of commodities a citizen could acquire.America was go through popular magazines, cinema and television, pop music and rock n roll, automobiles and domestic help appliances in steadily increasing numbers. They were encouraged to spend by a vast advertising sector that deliberately interpreted consumption as a measure of ones financial success and psychological wellbeing.American Pop Art was a very unified, more organised movement than the British. at that place were more unmistakable park characteristics such as the contemporary imagery, the abstruseness of surface, and blustering, strong colours. As opposed to the British also, American artists had a tendency to be more ambiguous and less like the transparent converse through British pop art. Many of the American artists suggested with humour that art was like any other consumer product that could be marketed.Andy WarholAndy Warhol is likely the intimately famous pop artist and one of the most well-known artists in the west, with his work being placed on t-shirts and mugs and any other miscellanea of merchandise. Known best for his Campbell soup cans, marylin Monroe prints and velvet underground album cover, in all of these pieces hes used bold bright colours, quite a common character within American pop art. Most of, if not all of his Pop Art work was screen printed, this semi mechanized way of producing plant p romote pronounced the new era mass production, Andy Warhol was so fond of this whole idea that he dubbed his studio the Factory.Campbells Soup CansWarhol had a more creative and positive view on ordinary culture than most and felt that abstract expressionists had gone out of their way to bonk the wonder of modernity. The Campbell Soup Cans as well as his other series were the ideal opportunity to express this view on modern culture. However, Warhols unclouded manner laboured to be empty of emotional content and otiose to be commented on on a social level. In situation the work was designed to be with the least amount of emotion or individual expression.According to Marcel Duchamp if you take a Campbells Soup can and repeat it fifty times, you are not interested in the retinal image. The depictions of the multiple cans are almost an abstraction in themselves with attention cogitate on the panorama rather than the individual cans and their details.it could be said that the symbo lic identity of the multiple can depictions (freedom of choice, mass production etc.) became more important than the individual symbols. Warhol had a big interest in in grind like production in his early days of pop art which was mistaken by fine artists in general as their value system disagreed with mechanization.To further resonate the message of consumerism and mass production behind his art along with the silk screen printing, naming his studio the factory and creating series, he also took on a pop persona as he and his work became more noticed by the media.He began to adopt the image of a teenager of the time, engaging himself in pop culture like rock shows, so much so that he produced an album cover for the velvet underground and had famous friends hangout in his factory.I shop therefore I am Barbara KrugerI shop therefore I am is a print of a hand holding a red card with white lettering, by photographer Barbara Kruger. It is a bold statement about Western culture and consu merism and is great in how implicates viewers by giving no clear notion of who is speaking, so it could be in the flesh(predicate) to her, personal from someone else, or relative to everyone, sucking the viewer in and making them consider about the art on a more personal level.The message behind the piece is saying that we dont just shop for the things we need. We shop to obtain an identity, persona and certain status and we do this so that we feel that we fit in and belong to a certain group in society.ConclusionPop Art was evidently considerably different between America and Britain with the rest of Europe not quite producing richly fledged pop art works or taking the movement so seriously. Britain was quite clearly optimistic for the future of consumerism although it had undertones of concern and business organization of the unknown as you would expect. In my opinion, the reason why the two natures were different is that America had evolved from the war economy before Britain so the advertisements being filtered through to Britain seemed alien and astounding, hence the large numbers of cut-outs being the primary abode of pop art in Britain. America then acknowledged the movement and kept quite an intellectual spin on it all, with ambiguity present and narratives, part of what the British independent group was against, trying to keep the art open and objective rather than subjective and could be called the peoples art an art for everyone that requires no preliminary knowledge or particular understanding.The American pop art was a mixed movement with Andy Warhol producing the Campbell soup cans as a statement of mass production and consumerism but also as a statement that there is freedom and opportunity to choose what you want, almost as an echo of individuality which was very welcome and fantasized about. Although this is one of the more discernible works of American pop art this should not be seen to toy all of American work, Barbara Krugers work is of a different style again. Krugers work was mainly made up of found black and white photographs with bold white lettering on a red background. Each of her works had a bold statement on the photograph, encouraging the viewer to think more about it, the statement, usually an ambiguous one would be ground on society and topical. I shop therefore I am doesnt say who its referring to and has a message behind it rather than being obvious and clear of its nature. This evidence amongst many other American works further perpetuates my opinion that American work is more ambiguous and therefore more intellectual rather than pure aesthetic information.Therefore my answer to the skepticism is pop art a celebration or critique of consumer culture is that in the beginnings consumerism was heavily welcomed and a great relief celebrated by many, but still with some sceptical artists stating that consuming was becoming a reliance and for obvious reasons people worry when they have to rely on thin gs. Pop art in Britain was much more hedonistic, optimistic and transparent, probably as a notion of hope to cling on to as they emerged out from austerity. Pop art in America could be more pessimistic at times and narrated with hidden messages having to be prized from the works, but as with Britain I think the idea was still celebratory although there was a little more critique from America than Britain, this would only be pass judgment though as America being much larger would have more of a variation in opinion.