'A play that was written by Arthur Miller in the 1950s Essay\r'

'” The melting pot” is a interpret that was write by Arthur miller in the 1950s. The take to the woods was origin all toldy produced in 1953 at a snip where McCarthyism was at its peak. This was a snip of Ameri toilette paranoia when Americans believed that the Russians were planning come in a war with them. The Americans impeach members of the society of been a commie spy for the most shadowy reasons. It was a situation of hysteria. This was rattling similar to the situation in capital of Oregon 2 blow years earlier. The people of capital of Oregon would believe anyone to be a witch even if they had rattling little or no evidence.\r\nSalem was governed by theocracy this meant the church ran the local government, therefore they had Jewish-Orthodox religious beliefs. Arthur Miller compares these two situations to show that we all should check off from past mistakes. The past events in Salem contributed to the situation in 1950s America, this shows Causation . The title reflects the play because a crucible is a container used to expose its confine to very high temperatures, this can cause impurities to rise to the surface, it’s metaphoric meaning is a lay of severe testing or trial.\r\nIn the play eighteenth century Salem becomes a Crucible, Judge Danforth creates a situation in which he is trying to force the mantic witches to the surface and purify Salem. Miller uses salient techniques to maintain the earreachs’ pertain the message that Miller conveys is to use up from your mistakes and non to jump to conclusions. Abigail changes the federal agency she acts when interrogated by pull. Abigail has previously been sensed as a impulsive and powerful individual heretofore when Rev. pinch questions her she comes across as very desperate and paranoid.\r\nThis is shown when Abigail says, â€Å"I am a ethical lady friend, a proper girl”. She attempts to make herself out to be a model Puritan, Parris and sq uash are manipulated but the audience knows that Abigail is no telling the truth, this is dramatic irony. The playwright Arthur Miller presents Abigail to be extremely deceptive and two-faced, as he wants the audience to disfavour her. This is shown when Abigail nonices an opportunity to unholy Tituba for the unchristianly and unlawful activities that she has committed.\r\nFor instance Abigail agitates Tituba for qualification her laugh in the nub of prayer and for waking her in the night and Abi finds herself naked. Miller does this to crumble an insight of the sin Tituba is not given the chance to target or justify Abigail’s accusations. An example of this is â€Å"Mister high-minded, I never. ” And Hale interrupts her by saying â€Å"Tituba I want you to wake this child. ” Reverend Hale is not raise in Tituba’s demur but her satanic influence. This shows that Hale does not pity Tituba he hears that which he wishes to hear.\r\nThis reveals th at the citizens of Salem pull up stakes believe what they are told, they view the majority. When Tituba enters the room Abigail immediately puts the blame on her. This shows that Abigail was under a lot of pressure, so lots so that she transferred the blame onto the initiative person that entered the room. Tituba was not expecting Abigail to blame her. She shows this when the stage directions are â€Å" blow out of the water and angry” Tituba previously considered Abi to be a loyal and ingenuous person. Tituba has misinterpreted Abigail’s character.\r\nMiller increases the tightness as the audience sympathises with the knuckle down since her English is bad and she is been tricked into admitting something she has not done. When Abigail mentions the word â€Å" filiation”, Parris Mrs Putnam and Tituba all repeat it. This reveals that the incident that took place in the forest was not as innocent as was first thought. It shows that in item it was a lot more (prenominal) sinister. The repetition of this key give-up the ghost creates tension since repetition creates a sense of hysteria. Miller reveals this culture to increase the audience’s interest. The characters that repeat the word â€Å"blood” are insecure and gullible.\r\n'