The articles’ aims are similar in their exploration

The three essays, Islam is not the stem (or the Problem) by Daniel Brumberg, Is on that point an Muslim finish? by Yilmaz Esmer, and The Clash of elegances? by Samuel Huntington invest a look at acculturation as a dominant factor, in particular the business office of an Moslem elaboration, on a content and global take.The obliges aims be similar in their exploration of what it sum to be a Islamic civilization and the effects this is having and will continue to dumb engraft economic anyy, politically, and culturally for people residing in these countries and nearby.All of the writers, in the course of making and proving their hypotheses, attempt to coif what it is to be a civilization. Civilization, as Samuel Huntington explains, is a cultural entity a civilization is olibanum the highest cultural grouping of people and the broadest level of cultural individuality people leave short of that which distinguishes humans from other species (24).Civilizations discor d from each other along the lines of history, language, culture, tradition, and religion. In The Clash of Civilizations? Huntington takes a look at western civilizations in relation to non-western civilizations, including tho not limited to Islamic civilizations.Huntington pass ons that it is his imprint that civilization identity rather than raceal identity will be of ever increasing importance and that the or so significant conflicts will occur along cultural fault lines (25). If you read the news from the middle East on every assumption day, you can easily see Huntingtons ideas come to life. In Iraq, for instance, the biggest conflicts that now comprise are not threats from other nations but rather from the inside, peculiarly along religious lines.Huntington uses primarily history as the springboard for his theories, noting the changes in Islamic and European countries (citing heavily Russia as an example).In Is There an Islamic Civilization? Yilmaz Esmer attempts to use prehistoric hypotheses and statistical numbers to show the grade indicators, which can define Islamic civilization. He notes in the beginning of his essay that a large majority of people in secular but Islamic-dominated countries will early identify themselves as Muslim and past identify themselves by their nationhood. I ensnare this very interesting, being an American. I imagine, if you asked each given group of U.S. citizens how they identify themselves, whizz of their first responses would be American and thence their religious affiliation.In the course of the article Esmer is adapted to show through World set Survey statistics that in that respect are sure defining factors to Islam in connection with values.The most notable differences among Islamic nations and civilizations from non-Islamic nations and civilizations lie in gender equality and the importance of faith. As Huntington notes in his article, economic modernization and mixer change weaken the nation state as a source of identity. In much of the military personnel religion has move in to fill this gap (26).Unlike Huntington and Esmers essays, Daniel Brumbergs essay Islam is Not the tooth root (or the Problem) does not concentrate on the comment of civilizations, namely Islamic, but rather explores how trounce the West can work with Islamic civilizations and nations with a large Islamic house to explore republic and overcome the veritable autocracies that are the norm. One of the points I found the most interesting about Brumbergs essay was his exploration of the role identity plays in the bridge between democracy and the present autocracy of m all Islamic countries. Islam faces a unique challenge in supporting a democracy.As he explains, barriers are so formidable that, for the foreseeable future, any effective engagement with Islamist will affect dealing with activists, many of whom espouse ideas profoundly at odds with U.S. notions of democracy and emancipation (98) . In some of these countries, religion is so imbedded in the political framework it seems some impossible to extract it. Brumberg makes the case for non-Islamic groups to murder a voice alongside (not preferably of) the Islamic majority.From reading the three essays, I am able to draw my experience polishs on Islamic civilization and the role it will play in world politics. I think it is obvious that there is such a thing as Islamic civilization, as Esmers conclusion and Huntingtons history proves.As noted before, hardly watch the news on any given night or chasten out the world news office and there is bound to be an article positive, negative, or neutral on the signs of Islamic civilization in the world. But all of the essays still leave me wondering whats next? bequeath, as Brumberg advocates, the Islamic states send away their autocracies and allow non-Islamic interest groups to gain a hold in governing these nations? Will the ideological breaks between civilizations c ause flush bigger breaks within?Works CitedBrumberg, Daniel. Islam is Not the Solution (or the Problem).Esmer, Yilmaz. Is There an Islamic Civilization?Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations?